Re: [O] babel results handling

2013-04-04 Thread Rick Frankel
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:18:09AM -0600, Eric Schulte wrote: > Rick Frankel writes: > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 07:37:38AM -0600, Eric Schulte wrote: > > `sh' is probably not the best choice as a "gold standard" due to the > > fact that it only supports STDOUT ("output" and not "value"). > > >

Re: [O] babel results handling

2013-04-03 Thread Achim Gratz
Eric Schulte writes: > Would it be difficult to add another set of code blocks which > automatically compare the output of these automatically generated code > blocks, indicating when there are differences. I'd lobby for integration into the test framework. >> I still think that the scalar pipe-d

Re: [O] babel results handling

2013-04-03 Thread Eric Schulte
Rick Frankel writes: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 07:37:38AM -0600, Eric Schulte wrote: >> It is certainly true that Emacs Lisp is treated differently than all >> other languages. There are also significant differences between >> languages, e.g., session evaluation doesn't make sense for some >> la