On 3.3.2011, at 23:11, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:19:32 +0100
>> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 3.3.2011, at 05:18, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>>
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Maybe we should use something else to achieve symmetry, l
Hi Nick,
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:11:00 -0500
Nick Dokos wrote:
> > #+TBLFM: @>$>=vsum(@I..@II);%.2f
> >
> > It doesn't work. Whereas this does:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > #+TBLFM: @5$2=vsum(@I..@II);%.2f
> >
> > Am I doing something wrong?
> >
>
> I don't think so: I don't see Carsten's change eve
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:19:32 +0100
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> >
> > On 3.3.2011, at 05:18, Nick Dokos wrote:
> >
> > > Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > >
> > >> Maybe we should use something else to achieve symmetry, like @>
> > >> and $>.
> > >>
> > >> Comments?
>
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:19:32 +0100
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On 3.3.2011, at 05:18, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> > Carsten Dominik wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe we should use something else to achieve symmetry, like @>
> >> and $>.
> >>
> >> Comments?
> >>
> >
> > Perfect. Mirrors the keybinding for
On 3.3.2011, at 05:18, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> Maybe we should use something else to achieve symmetry, like @> and $>.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>
> Perfect. Mirrors the keybinding for end-of-buffer, so there is mnemonic
> value there, and it naturally flows from the @N$N n
Carsten Dominik writes:
>> FWIW I also find @> and $> to be better than @L and $L.
>
> OK, I will include this change into my next patch.
Thanks!!
--
Bastien
On 3.3.2011, at 05:18, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> Maybe we should use something else to achieve symmetry, like @> and $>.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>
> Perfect. Mirrors the keybinding for end-of-buffer, so there is mnemonic
> value there, and it naturally flows from the @N$N n
On 3.3.2011, at 09:28, Bastien wrote:
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
>> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe we should use something else to achieve symmetry, like @> and $>.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>
>> Perfect. Mirrors the keybinding for end-of-buffer, so there is mnemonic
>> value there, and it
Nick Dokos writes:
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> Maybe we should use something else to achieve symmetry, like @> and $>.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>
> Perfect. Mirrors the keybinding for end-of-buffer, so there is mnemonic
> value there, and it naturally flows from the @N$N notation.
FWIW I also fi
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Maybe we should use something else to achieve symmetry, like @> and $>.
>
> Comments?
>
Perfect. Mirrors the keybinding for end-of-buffer, so there is mnemonic
value there, and it naturally flows from the @N$N notation.
Something else that popped into my head: are th
On 3.3.2011, at 00:09, Christian Moe wrote:
> Hi, Carsten,
>
> Yes, it's really neat.
>
> I just realized, though, that there *is* an equally clean way to generate
> such tables in OOo Calc (which the Org spreadsheet has all but replaced for
> my needs):
>
> - Place 1 in cell B1. Drag across
On 2011-03-02, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Maybe we should use something else to achieve symmetry, like @> and $>.
Dunno if this comment helps, but I like predictable behavior, so that
should work.
--
The Kafka Pandemic:
http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2010/12/welcome-to-kafka-pandemic-two-f
Hi, Carsten,
Yes, it's really neat.
I just realized, though, that there *is* an equally clean way to
generate such tables in OOo Calc (which the Org spreadsheet has all
but replaced for my needs):
- Place 1 in cell B1. Drag across to get 1-10 in cells B1:K1.
- Place 1 in cell A2. Drag down t
On 2.3.2011, at 19:54, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2.3.2011, at 18:21, Bastien wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Carsten,
>>>
>>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>>
Bastien, please let me know if you want to have this integrated
before the release, then I will do so.
>>>
>>> P
Hi Nick,
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:54:09 -0500
Nick Dokos wrote:
> One nit: symmetry dictates that $L should be the last column, but it
> isn't. Trying @2$2..@L$11 in Christian's example works fine, but
> @2$2..@L$L changes the first column to all zeroes (not sure why).
I can't find a reference t
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On 2.3.2011, at 18:21, Bastien wrote:
>
> > Hi Carsten,
> >
> > Carsten Dominik writes:
> >
> >> Bastien, please let me know if you want to have this integrated
> >> before the release, then I will do so.
> >
> > Please go ahead! This looks like a nice addition,
On 2.3.2011, at 18:21, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> Bastien, please let me know if you want to have this integrated
>> before the release, then I will do so.
>
> Please go ahead! This looks like a nice addition, thanks for that.
I just pushed it. The patch
Hi Christian,
thanks for the great example! I guess this is really something Org has over
other spreadsheets. No copy-and-paste-with-modification, just a single formula.
- Carsten
On 2.3.2011, at 17:11, Christian Moe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Row formulas are great! I've missed this, but learned to
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Bastien, please let me know if you want to have this integrated
> before the release, then I will do so.
Please go ahead! This looks like a nice addition, thanks for that.
--
Bastien
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing
Hi Carsten,
This is really cool!
Thanks and Best Regards,
Bernt
Christian Moe writes:
> Hi,
>
> Row formulas are great! I've missed this, but learned to work around
> it, since I I just assumed that if you hadn't already done it, it was
> not a reasonable thing to ask for.
>
> Testing... So
Hi,
Row formulas are great! I've missed this, but learned to work around
it, since I I just assumed that if you hadn't already done it, it was
not a reasonable thing to ask for.
Testing... So now we can simply do e.g.:
#+CAPTION: A multiplication table
|| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
21 matches
Mail list logo
