Re: [O] Remaining document problems

2016-10-13 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Thursday, 13 Oct 2016 at 12:46, Peter Davis wrote: >> For completeness, would you please tell us your solution? I'm sure this >> question will come up again at some point... >> > > Sure thing, Eric. Basically, I just added the following to my org file: Thanks. Useful to have the definition f

Re: [O] Remaining document problems

2016-10-13 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Thursday, 13 Oct 2016 at 12:46, Peter Davis wrote: > NOTE: The prebreak and postbreak definitions just add little red hooks > to the source block to show me where a line break was added. It's a > trick I picked up on this list a while ago. Oh, and thanks for this! This is very useful. -- : E

Re: [O] Remaining document problems

2016-10-13 Thread Peter Davis
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, at 04:08 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2016 at 16:35, Peter Davis wrote: > > [...] > > > Excellent! Thanks to this, I now have great looking JavaScript > > listings, and I can easily change the styling. > > For completeness, would you please tell us your

Re: [O] Remaining document problems

2016-10-13 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Wednesday, 12 Oct 2016 at 16:35, Peter Davis wrote: [...] > Excellent! Thanks to this, I now have great looking JavaScript > listings, and I can easily change the styling. For completeness, would you please tell us your solution? I'm sure this question will come up again at some point... T

Re: [O] Remaining document problems

2016-10-12 Thread Peter Davis
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016, at 11:39 AM, Nick Dokos wrote: > Peter Davis writes: > > > A. Source code listings > > > > 1) Source code blocks: Using > > > > #+BEGIN_SRC js > > > > works for HTML output, but not for LaTeX/PDF. It seems js is not > > understood by the listings package, and I have to use

Re: [O] Remaining document problems

2016-10-12 Thread Nick Dokos
Peter Davis writes: > A. Source code listings > > 1) Source code blocks: Using > > #+BEGIN_SRC js > > works for HTML output, but not for LaTeX/PDF. It seems js is not > understood by the listings package, and I have to use java. > > 2) Even with java, the output is pretty ugly. Any way to get som