Re: [O] Possible regexp bug in org.el

Hi Thorsten and Nicolas, Nicolas Richard writes: > It's almost certainly a typo, but it introduces no bug because '*' can't > bear its special meaning after '^', so the regexp engine will make it > match exactly the '*' character. But it'd be better written as "^*+" > (but this is not recommende

Re: [O] Possible regexp bug in org.el

Thorsten Jolitz writes: > here is a possible regexp bug in org.el I discovered by accident: > > ,- > | 7734: (and (not (looking-back "^\*+")) > `- It's almost certainly a typo, but it introduces no bug b