Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-10-11 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Please go ahead (applying the patch, not bugging somebody!). Alan, from now on, you can use this as a general rule :) Thanks! -- Bastien

Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-10-09 Thread Steve Purcell
On 9 Oct 2014, at 12:40, Alan Schmitt wrote: > > Applied. Thank you for the patch and sorry for the delay. > Thanks for merging both of those patches. I’ll re-work the other one (re. broken “message:” links) in the near future and resubmit. -Steve

Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-10-09 Thread Alan Schmitt
On 2014-09-24 12:12, Steve Purcell writes: > The existing Applescript for grabbing flagged mail messages can only work on > machines which have Growl installed. This is increasingly rarely the case as > Growl has been obsoleted by OS X’s own notification system. Applied. Thank you for the patc

Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-10-06 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Unless I'm mistaken, I did not receive a reply to this question: can > I apply this patch? > > I understand that Bastien is quite busy at the moment, so I'm wondering > if I should bug somebody else ;) Please go ahead (applying the patch, not bugging somebody!).

Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-10-05 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello, Unless I'm mistaken, I did not receive a reply to this question: can I apply this patch? I understand that Bastien is quite busy at the moment, so I'm wondering if I should bug somebody else ;) Best, Alan On 2014-09-25 08:17, Alan Schmitt writes: > On 2014-09-24 20:59, Steve Purcell

Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-09-24 Thread Alan Schmitt
On 2014-09-24 20:59, Steve Purcell writes: > On 24 Sep 2014, at 20:13, Alan Schmitt wrote: > >> tell application "System Events" >> set growlHelpers to the name of every process whose creator type >> contains "GRRR" >> if (count of growlHelpers) > 0 then >> set growlHelpe

Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-09-24 Thread Steve Purcell
On 24 Sep 2014, at 20:13, Alan Schmitt wrote: > tell application "System Events" > set growlHelpers to the name of every process whose creator type > contains "GRRR" > if (count of growlHelpers) > 0 then > set growlHelperApp to item 1 of growlHelpers > else >

Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-09-24 Thread Alan Schmitt
On 2014-09-24 16:35, Steve Purcell writes: > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> On 2014-09-24 12:12, Steve Purcell writes: >> I'm surprised: I don't have Growl installed and it still works. I agree >> there is not much point in testing for Growl, though. > > I get the system popup asking me to locate th

Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-09-24 Thread Steve Purcell
Alan Schmitt writes: > On 2014-09-24 12:12, Steve Purcell writes: > I'm surprised: I don't have Growl installed and it still works. I agree > there is not much point in testing for Growl, though. I get the system popup asking me to locate the "growlHelperApp" program. -Steve

Re: [O] PATCH: org-mac-link.el: Don't fail on machines without Growl installed

2014-09-24 Thread Alan Schmitt
On 2014-09-24 12:12, Steve Purcell writes: > The existing Applescript for grabbing flagged mail messages can only > work on machines which have Growl installed. This is increasingly > rarely the case as Growl has been obsoleted by OS X’s own notification > system. I'm surprised: I don't have Gro