Andreas Leha writes:
> Leo Alekseyev writes:
>
>> I am afraid this might have caused a regression (although it could've
>> been something else). With the latest org-mode pull, C-x C-s in
>> org-src buffer does not save the underlying org-file (as expected) but
>> instead prompts for file name t
Leo Alekseyev writes:
> I am afraid this might have caused a regression (although it could've
> been something else). With the latest org-mode pull, C-x C-s in
> org-src buffer does not save the underlying org-file (as expected) but
> instead prompts for file name to save. This is rather bad be
I am afraid this might have caused a regression (although it could've
been something else). With the latest org-mode pull, C-x C-s in
org-src buffer does not save the underlying org-file (as expected) but
instead prompts for file name to save. This is rather bad behavior.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at
Hi Leo,
Leo Alekseyev writes:
> Folks, I still think that the fact that buffer-file-name is not nil is
> a bug and should be fixed.
So do I. I think this is fixed now -- thanks!
--
Bastien
>>>
>>> You still have to C-c ' to get back to the full buffer, mind you, but
>>> that's better, IMO, than changing the behaviour of such a fundamental
>>> key binding as C-x C-s.
>
>
> It appears that this bug is Emacs-version dependent: it functions as
> you descri
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Andreas Leha
wrote:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> Leo Alekseyev writes:
>>
Eric S Fraga writes:
>
> What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
>>>
> the annoyance you describe a while back; more recently (since at least
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Leo Alekseyev writes:
>
>>> Eric S Fraga writes:
What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
>>
the annoyance you describe a while back; more recently (since at least a
few months ago), hitting C-x C-s no longer has any negat
Leo Alekseyev writes:
>> Eric S Fraga writes:
>>>
>>> What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
>
>>> the annoyance you describe a while back; more recently (since at least a
>>> few months ago), hitting C-x C-s no longer has any negative impact: it
>>> saves the fil
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Leo Alekseyev wrote:
>> Eric S Fraga writes:
>>>
>>> What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
>>> the annoyance you describe a while back; more recently (since at least a
>>> few months ago), hitting C-x C-s no longer has any negative
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>>
>> What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
>> the annoyance you describe a while back; more recently (since at least a
>> few months ago), hitting C-x C-s no longer has any negative impact: it
>> saves the file, or at least appears to.
>>
>>
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Leo Alekseyev writes:
>
>> I often edit my org-babel code blocks via org-edit-special (C-'), in
>> part because I find the tabbing behavior within the code blocks to be
>> somewhat flaky. Inevitably, when editing the code block I will press
>> C-x C-s (muscle memory). This
Leo Alekseyev writes:
> I often edit my org-babel code blocks via org-edit-special (C-'), in
> part because I find the tabbing behavior within the code blocks to be
> somewhat flaky. Inevitably, when editing the code block I will press
> C-x C-s (muscle memory). This causes all sorts of annoying
12 matches
Mail list logo