Samuel Wales writes:
> Hmm, maybe something like this:
>
> $[link "http://mysite.example"; :label "Example" :html-attr "..."
> :latex-attr "..."]
>
> Code that adds functionality or safety to this syntax (including all
> future code) will also apply to other features than links. For a new
> fe
Hmm, maybe something like this:
$[link "http://mysite.example"; :label "Example" :html-attr "..."
:latex-attr "..."]
Code that adds functionality or safety to this syntax (including all
future code) will also apply to other features than links. For a new
feature, replace the first element with
Hello Avdi,
I'm glad you like it!
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
> I really like this idea!
>
This change may be Herculean--giving links full access to
target attributes--but I certainly hope not.
As I thought about it, it seems like fair amount of abstraction will be
poss
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:53 PM, William Crandall wrote:
> ATTRIBUTES would consisting of name:value pairs, perhaps
> giving names export-type prefixes, such as HTML_STYLE and
> HTML_TITLE, or LATEX_PDFBORDER and LATEX_URLCOLOR.
>
> HTML ATTRIBUTES would map to HTML 'attributes':
>
> http://www.w3
William Crandall writes:
> Hello Nicolas,
>
> Many thanks for expanded clarity, and a new direction.
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:51 AM,
> Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
>> I understand your problem, but inserting ATTR_HTML
>> keywords in a paragraph isn't possible anymore. I cannot
>> allow that as
Hello Nicolas,
Many thanks for expanded clarity, and a new direction.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:51 AM,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> I understand your problem, but inserting ATTR_HTML
> keywords in a paragraph isn't possible anymore. I cannot
> allow that as it would defeat a fundamental change in t
