Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-28 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Nick Dokos wrote: > My org-latex-pdf-process setting is > > (setq org-latex-pdf-process '("texi2dvi --shell-escape --pdf %f")) > > and I'm experimenting with > > (setq org-latex-pdf-process '("latexmk --shell-escape -pdf -xelatex %f")) FWIW, I do have: (setq org-latex-pdf-process

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-11 Thread Joseph Vidal-Rosset
2014-07-11 20:05 GMT+02:00 Nick Dokos : > My org-latex-pdf-process setting is > > (setq org-latex-pdf-process '("texi2dvi --shell-escape --pdf %f")) > > and I'm experimenting with > > (setq org-latex-pdf-process '("latexmk --shell-escape -pdf -xelatex %f")) > I am going to test this code, an

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-11 Thread Nick Dokos
Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: > > I guess that I have to put in  my .bashrc a command to say that I always > > want to use latex with -shell-escape option  , but I am not sure that it > > is the best solution. > > > > -shell-escape is a security risk, allowing arbitrary prog

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-11 Thread Joseph Vidal-Rosset
2014-07-11 17:59 GMT+02:00 Nick Dokos : > And you are sure that it is named > "latex15065_PG_37f10648c57a40194a74eaabbaa5c1678a5d2046.png" ? > The existing file might be a remnant from a previous run with a slightly > different name (uuid readability is not the best :-) ) > > :) I am pretty sure,

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-11 Thread Nick Dokos
Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: > Le ven. 11 juil. 2014 à 02:59:23 , Nick Dokos a > envoyé ce message: > >> >> Can you please post an example org file and the tex file that's produced >> that gives you such bad images? > > Dear Nick, > > I sent an email three days ago to tell you that I've got

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-11 Thread Joseph Vidal-Rosset
Le ven. 11 juil. 2014 à 02:59:23 , Nick Dokos a envoyé ce message: > > Can you please post an example org file and the tex file that's produced > that gives you such bad images? Dear Nick, I sent an email three days ago to tell you that I've got the solution. I said: " I have put again

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-10 Thread Nick Dokos
Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: > Hello Nick, hello everybody > > Before using your suggestion of debugging, I have made another test to > convert formulas made with different latex packages into png images for > a html file. > > At the beginning of my org file: > > All formulas used with the equatio

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-10 Thread Joseph Vidal-Rosset
#+OPTIONS: latex:t #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{bussproofs} Hello Nick, hello everybody Before using your suggestion of debugging, I have made another test to convert formulas made with different latex packages into png images for a html file. At the beginning of my org file: #+LATEX_HEADER

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-09 Thread Joseph Vidal-Rosset
Hello Nick, hello everybody, I have finally got the solution. I have put again in my init.el the code from the page http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-latex-preview.html , i.e. (setq org-latex-listings 'minted) (require 'ox-latex) (add-to-list 'org-latex-packages-alist '("" "minted"))

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-08 Thread Joseph Vidal-Rosset
2014-07-08 15:01 GMT+02:00 Joseph Vidal-Rosset < joseph.vidal.ros...@gmail.com>: > That's strange because it works well with LaTeX export and even with > latex-preview-image and org-htmlize. This image of implication > elimination rule in my gnus-message should be nice: > > [image: \begin{prooftre

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-06 Thread Nick Dokos
Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: > To convert equations from *.org  into *.html, Mathjax is certainly the > best solution but unfortunately, this solution does not work as soons > as one need to use some texlive package convenient to produce easily > proofs in specific format (for example if one uses

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-06 Thread Joseph Vidal-Rosset
Thanks for your reply. Do you mean that #+OPTIONS: tex:imagemagick must be mentioned first? In my opinion something is wrong in my setup and it is difficult for me to see what's wrong. Even a minima-init.el file is not helpful... Best wishes, Jo. 2014-07-06 10:39 GMT+02:00 briangpowell . :

Re: [O] Mathjax vs. problems with imagemagick

2014-07-06 Thread briangpowell .
* PNG is "lossless" format--if you can, make it the first file you create rather than last. ** If you create a JPG a "lossy" format then you could lose some of the beauty (like your example). * ImageMagick has many switches you can throw--suggest you look deeper into it in the freely available ma