Another issue with splitting is the problem of archiving.
Looking for problems, solutions, hacks and code in one single mailing
list has proven very useful so far -- I want to keep that.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
> Julien Danjou writes:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
>>
>> The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since
>> they will forget (I will), and there is _no_ lose by splitting a list. I
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> No, I
> DEV threads often start life as USER threads;
For example, org-odt.el.
Jambunathan K.
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Julien Danjou writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
>
> The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since
> they will forget (I will), and there is _no_ lose by splitting a list. I
Hi Julien,
No, I disagree with that. The two lists would have distinct compositions
Julien Danjou writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
>
> The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since
> they will forget (I will),
I disagree, [babel] tags have been working very well for some time now,
even if the original poster forgets to add such a tag it o
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since
they will forget (I will), and there is _no_ lose by splitting a list. I
already splitted user list in some project and nothing bad happened. :)
> Julien, I guess your life would be easier