James Harkins writes:
[...]
> Ok, based on this and Marcin's comments, I'll do it the LaTeX way (which was
> my first choice anyway).
I think this is a good choice. It's what I try to do whenever
possible. And for cases where the submission is meant to be "camera
ready", the latex produced
Dnia 2013-04-30, o godz. 01:57:51
James Harkins < jamshar...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> Ok, based on this and Marcin's comments, I'll do it the LaTeX way
> (which was my first choice anyway).
Now I'll feel responsible for your LaTeX problems;).
Seriously, though: should you run into LaTeX problems
mohamed gmail.com> writes:
> I used both aproaches :
> - Usually I customize the org options (latex templates) to meet the
> requirements of the final document. It is convenient for me to stay in
> emacs. For the gray hairs, you do it once and thus you have minor
> modifications.
>
> - But some
Dnia 2013-04-29, o godz. 07:22:23
James Harkins napisał(a):
> Or, export to ODT and let LibreOffice turn that into a PDF. I hesitate
> to do this, when LaTeX is a far superior typesetter. (But, tweaking
> all the formatting details in LaTeX is quite likely to give me some
> more gray hairs...)
W
James Harkins gmail.com> writes:
>
> Actually, let me take a few steps back from my specific question about
> the title command. There are some other workflow questions that might
> make that question redundant.
>
> This journal (for some reason unknown to me) has designed the
> publication for
