Re: [O] Commenting out #+

2016-01-18 Thread Kaushal Modi
# followed by space is a comment. So below would be a comment too. # #+STARTUP On Monday, January 18, 2016, Eric Brown wrote: > Dear List, > > I would like to comment out directives like: > > #+STARTUP > > but I would like to keep them around for future use, e.g. > > ##+STARTUP > > Is this sort

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-22 Thread Rainer Stengele
Am 22.01.2013 16:43, schrieb Bastien: > Hi Rainer and all, > > Rainer Stengele writes: > >> As my agenda was and is slow and only became faster after Bastiens >> optimisations lately I do not want to motivate changes which makes the >> agenda creation slower again. I am happy with setting a '#'

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-22 Thread Bastien
Hi Rainer and all, Rainer Stengele writes: > As my agenda was and is slow and only became faster after Bastiens > optimisations lately I do not want to motivate changes which makes the > agenda creation slower again. I am happy with setting a '#' at bol. I fixed this. The check is now done che

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-17 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 17.1.2013, at 16:47, Nick Dokos wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> >> On 17.1.2013, at 09:54, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> ... >>> I tried with my agenda which calls org-agenda-skip 5768 times. Without >>> the mod, they took 0.13s; with the mod, they took 0.19s, so that's a 50% >>> increa

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-17 Thread Nick Dokos
Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On 17.1.2013, at 09:54, Nick Dokos wrote: > > > ... > > I tried with my agenda which calls org-agenda-skip 5768 times. Without > > the mod, they took 0.13s; with the mod, they took 0.19s, so that's a 50% > > increase - but the overall time was actually shorter in th

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-17 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 17.1.2013, at 09:54, Nick Dokos wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> >> On 17.1.2013, at 06:02, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> ... >>> It sets p to the point at the beginning of the line and then >>> checks if the character after it is '#'. Only then does it skip >>> the entry. >> >> And this

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-17 Thread Rainer Stengele
Am 17.01.2013 09:54, schrieb Nick Dokos: > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> >> On 17.1.2013, at 06:02, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> ... >>> It sets p to the point at the beginning of the line and then >>> checks if the character after it is '#'. Only then does it skip >>> the entry. >> >> And this is don

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-17 Thread Nick Dokos
Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On 17.1.2013, at 06:02, Nick Dokos wrote: > > > ... > > It sets p to the point at the beginning of the line and then > > checks if the character after it is '#'. Only then does it skip > > the entry. > > And this is done for speed. Maybe Moore's law has progressed

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-16 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 17.1.2013, at 06:02, Nick Dokos wrote: > Nick Dokos wrote: > >> Rainer Stengele wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Imagine you have a todo like this: >>> >>> * TODO a task >>> SCHEDULED: <2013-01-16 Mi +2m> >>> >>> Now suppose you want to put that todo on hold. In order to no more see

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-16 Thread Nick Dokos
Nick Dokos wrote: > Rainer Stengele wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Imagine you have a todo like this: > > > > * TODO a task > > SCHEDULED: <2013-01-16 Mi +2m> > > > > Now suppose you want to put that todo on hold. In order to no more see > > the scheduled date in the agenda I comment out

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-16 Thread Nick Dokos
Rainer Stengele wrote: > Hi! > > Imagine you have a todo like this: > > * TODO a task > SCHEDULED: <2013-01-16 Mi +2m> > > Now suppose you want to put that todo on hold. In order to no more see > the scheduled date in the agenda I comment out the "SCHEDULED" line. > I do not want to

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-16 Thread Markus Heller
Rainer Stengele writes: > Am 16.01.2013 17:49, schrieb Markus Heller: >> Rainer Stengele writes: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Imagine you have a todo like this: >>> >>> * TODO a task >>> SCHEDULED: <2013-01-16 Mi +2m> >>> >>> Now suppose you want to put that todo on hold. In order to no more se

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-16 Thread Rainer Stengele
Am 16.01.2013 17:49, schrieb Markus Heller: > Rainer Stengele writes: > >> Hi! >> >> Imagine you have a todo like this: >> >> * TODO a task >> SCHEDULED: <2013-01-16 Mi +2m> >> >> Now suppose you want to put that todo on hold. In order to no more see >> the scheduled date in the agenda

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-16 Thread Markus Heller
Rainer Stengele writes: > Hi! > > Imagine you have a todo like this: > > * TODO a task > SCHEDULED: <2013-01-16 Mi +2m> > > Now suppose you want to put that todo on hold. In order to no more see > the scheduled date in the agenda I comment out the "SCHEDULED" line. > I do not want to de