Hi Bastien
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Michael Brand writes:
>> With the related commit release_7.9.1-93-ge8b45bb the agenda view
>> priority of all entries in the agenda view becomes -1000. Before, most
>> of all the scheduled and deadline were different for different tar
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand writes:
> With the related commit release_7.9.1-93-ge8b45bb the agenda view
> priority of all entries in the agenda view becomes -1000. Before, most
> of all the scheduled and deadline were different for different target
> dates.
This is now fixed in maint.
> Only as
Hi Bastien
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Bastien wrote:
> You can now use both `,' and `C-c ,' in agenda to set the priority.
>
> You can also use `C-u ,' and `C-u C-c ,' to see the see the priority.
> Note that the priority displayed is a number, not the priority cookie.
> Also this number fo
You can now use both `,' and `C-c ,' in agenda to set the priority.
You can also use `C-u ,' and `C-u C-c ,' to see the see the priority.
Note that the priority displayed is a number, not the priority cookie.
Also this number for the same headline will differ in agendas and in
Org buffers, as the
FBastien writes:
> Robert Horn writes:
>
>> I think that the key mapping for "," and "C-c," in agenda is a mistake
>> and should be swapped.
>
> The agenda is read-only, so short keystrokes are often preferred
> over long one. "," being short for "C-c ," looks natural and intuitive,
> so I d
Robert Horn writes:
> I think that the key mapping for "," and "C-c," in agenda is a mistake
> and should be swapped.
The agenda is read-only, so short keystrokes are often preferred
over long one. "," being short for "C-c ," looks natural and intuitive,
so I don't think the change is necess
