Hello,
Achim Gratz writes:
> I actually like the ability to split lines with M-RET, especially since
> there doesn't seem to be a sane way to tell org that "yes I want to
> split the line this time". What I want is that "point at EOL" is
> recognized as a special situation, much like "point at
Bernt Hansen writes:
> I use C-RET for inserting new headings and respecting content.
That _only_ works for headings, not items. C-RET always inserts a new
heading (and BTW, it does treat BOL specially, too).
> M-RET should NOT respect content in my setup so I think your
> suggestion would make
Achim Gratz writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> By default, M-RET is allowed to split lines, and therefore contents.
>
> Let me re-formulate my request:
>
> If the point is at EOL, there actually is no line to split and it
> would be far
> more logical if the new heading/item would simply be in
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> By default, M-RET is allowed to split lines, and therefore contents.
Let me re-formulate my request:
If the point is at EOL, there actually is no line to split and it would be far
more logical if the new heading/item would simply be inserted after the
current one (inclu
Hello,
Achim Gratz writes:
> The command M-RET actually does what it's docstring says (insert before
> when point is at BOL, split line when it is inside), but there is
> inconsistent behaviour when point is at EOL, IMHO. Consider the
> following list (or equivalent headline structure), with poi
