Carsten Dominik writes:
>> Is this something that we can (easily) fix?
>
> Not easily. I have made it throw an error now, but there may be
> other situations like this which are not yet captured.
Throwing an error in this case is already an improvement -- thanks
for this!
--
Bastien
On 24.8.2011, at 20:29, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> Let's consider the following table:
>>
>> #+begin_src org
>> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
>> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
>> #+TBLFM: @2$1..@2$3=@1
>> #+end_src
>>
>> If I remove the second column (M-S-Left), the formula is correctly
>>
Hi Carsten,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Let's consider the following table:
>
> #+begin_src org
> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
> #+TBLFM: @2$1..@2$3=@1
> #+end_src
>
> If I remove the second column (M-S-Left), the formula is correctly
> updated. But when I remove the last column, the formula gets
Hello,
Michael Brand writes:
> Columns and rows are better referenced with "<" and ">" in many cases
> to avoid such oddities:
>
> #+begin_src org
> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
> #+TBLFM: @2$<..@2$>=@1
> #+end_src
Thanks for the pointers.
Though, the object of my message was more to point at
Hi Nicolas
Columns and rows are better referenced with "<" and ">" in many cases
to avoid such oddities:
#+begin_src org
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
#+TBLFM: @2$<..@2$>=@1
#+end_src
http://orgmode.org/manual/References.html#References
Michael
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 14:50, Nicolas Goaziou wrot
