Sebastien Vauban writes:
> Though, after restarting Emacs, I do have:
>
> File mode specification error: (void-function org-find-library-dir)
Could you please specify how to elicit that particular message from an
'emacs -Q -nw' session?
> I see that there is no autoload cookie for it in `org-comp
Achim Gratz writes:
> Based on that assumption, here's another patch. Let me know if this
> works in your setup.
I just applied this patch, thanks.
--
Bastien
Hi Achim,
> Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Based on that assumption, here's another patch. Let me know if this
>> works in your setup.
>
> As you can see, that *does* work... Thanks a lot, Achim!
>
> Sebastien@MEDIACENTER:home/org-mode 0$ make autoloads
> make -C lisp autoloads
> make[1]: Entering directo
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>> Are you trying to use an NTemacs perhaps?!
No, I'm on Windows, but I don't use anymore (for years) the customized and
patched Emacs binaries such as NTEmacs or EmacsW32.
I do only use the official binary from Gnu. Currently:
GNU Emacs 24
Achim Gratz writes:
> Are you trying to use an NTemacs perhaps?!
Based on that assumption, here's another patch. Let me know if this
works in your setup.
>From 2fcce20d5a7d6c504c30117a287e7ee5d52530c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Achim Gratz
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 22:08:06 +0200
Subject: [PAT
Sebastien Vauban writes:
> Maybe you can understand from where that could come.
Are you trying to use an NTemacs perhaps?! If so, wouldn't you think
that might be an important information?
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
SD adaptations f
Sebastien Vauban writes:
> Surprise... I hadn't touched (of course) org-fixup.el in any way, except by
> changing the permissions (to 0777).
As far as Git is concerned, changing the permissions is the same as
changing the file content.
> C:/home/org-mode/lisp/ and
> /cygdrive/c/home/org-m
Hi Achim,
Bastien wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>
>> While I still don't understand how this is happening exactly, I've
>> re-written the functions in question to work off temporary buffers, which
>> only runs into the problem of non-writability at the very end when the file
>> is to be saved and
Achim Gratz writes:
> While I still don't understand how this is happening exactly, I've
> re-written the functions in question to work off temporary buffers,
> which only runs into the problem of non-writability at the very end when
> the file is to be saved and should then ask for confirmation.
