Hi Tom,
Thanks for the Worg documentation. I don't have the FSF papers yet, but I
will sign and send them soon.
It looks like the Babel SQL support would benefit from more modular
approach so that adding new engine would not require modifying existing
functions. Perhaps, something like the Emacs
Hi Alex,
I made a first draft of the Babel SQL documentation for Worg. See
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-sql.html
Please edit or augment as you see fit.
I believe you need FSF papers to contribute to ob-sql.el. If you have
those, then by all means, please add Nete
I found an answer to my question. It turned out this behavior is described
in the documentation for org-babel-expand-noweb-references:
"Note that any text preceding the <> construct on a line will be
interposed between the lines of the replacement text. So for example if
<> is placed behind a com
Hi Tom,
Unfortunately I can't have pure SQL output in my org files for two reasons:
1. The result set I am dealing with for this particular problem is about
2 records
2. My SQL server (Netezza, "big data appliance") is not supported by
Babel-SQL. I configured sql-mode to work with Netezza but
Aloha Alex,
My work flow in this situation evaluates the SQL to create an Org-mode
table, which serves as input to the R source code block.
For me, seeing the SQL output in a table is a sanity check.
hth,
Tom
Alexander Vorobiev writes:
> I have R code which submits SQL statements to a databas
