Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Bastien
Hi Daimrod, Daimrod writes: > Ok, I've already sent an assignment request for another patch and it > should be confirmed by the end of the week. Don't be too optimistic, it takes usually longer, at least three weeks. You can still send patches, we will apply them when the FSF confirmed your a

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Bastien
Achim Gratz writes: > Nick Dokos writes: >> I believe that just as with code changes, doc changes also need FSF >> copyright assignment. > > The FSF owns the copyright to all of Org, including the > documentation. More precisely, the FSF owns the copyright of GNU Emacs, and assignments are sign

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Daimrod
Nick Dokos writes: > Daimrod wrote: > >> John Hendy writes: >> >> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Daimrod wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> It would be nice if the documentation mentioned the need to reparse the >> >> org buffer with `C-c C-c' when a property is set with #+PROPERTY. >> >> (inf

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-21 Thread Achim Gratz
Nick Dokos writes: > I believe that just as with code changes, doc changes also need FSF > copyright assignment. The FSF owns the copyright to all of Org, including the documentation. So yes, anything over 20 lines non-trivial chnages needs to be assigned to FSF. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matri

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Daimrod wrote: > John Hendy writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Daimrod wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It would be nice if the documentation mentioned the need to reparse the > >> org buffer with `C-c C-c' when a property is set with #+PROPERTY. > >> (info "(org) Property syntax") > > >

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-21 Thread Daimrod
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Aloha Daimrod (Greg), > > Daimrod writes: > >> >> So, here is a patch for this: > > If you add [PATCH] to the email Subject, your patch will be brought to > the attention of the developers. I didn't know, thanks. > All the best, > Tom -- Daimrod/Greg

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-21 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha Daimrod (Greg), Daimrod writes: > > So, here is a patch for this: If you add [PATCH] to the email Subject, your patch will be brought to the attention of the developers. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-21 Thread John Hendy
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Daimrod wrote: > John Hendy writes: > >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Daimrod wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It would be nice if the documentation mentioned the need to reparse the >>> org buffer with `C-c C-c' when a property is set with #+PROPERTY. >>> (info "(org

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-21 Thread Daimrod
Daimrod writes: > John Hendy writes: > >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Daimrod wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It would be nice if the documentation mentioned the need to reparse the >>> org buffer with `C-c C-c' when a property is set with #+PROPERTY. >>> (info "(org) Property syntax") >> >> As in

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-21 Thread Daimrod
John Hendy writes: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Daimrod wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It would be nice if the documentation mentioned the need to reparse the >> org buffer with `C-c C-c' when a property is set with #+PROPERTY. >> (info "(org) Property syntax") > > As in adding to the header argumen

Re: [O] #+PROPERTY documentation

2013-01-21 Thread John Hendy
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Daimrod wrote: > Hi, > > It would be nice if the documentation mentioned the need to reparse the > org buffer with `C-c C-c' when a property is set with #+PROPERTY. > (info "(org) Property syntax") As in adding to the header arguments? Yeah, probably wouldn't hur