Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> I see. I did not read carefully enough. Fine with me as well.
>
> I pushed it in 1362c2d22b037f43bd9f5a42c01c7ca8300d14cd (master). Thanks
> again for the feedback.
>
Thanks! A big improvement for me.
Andreas
Andreas Leha writes:
> I see. I did not read carefully enough. Fine with me as well.
I pushed it in 1362c2d22b037f43bd9f5a42c01c7ca8300d14cd (master). Thanks
again for the feedback.
Regards,
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> On some more testing, this description is wrong. C-c C-x C-l never does
>> anything on the first headline, e.g., which I think it should.
>
> C-c C-x C-l on the first, or any other, headline toggles LaTeX fragments
> in the section
Andreas Leha writes:
> On some more testing, this description is wrong. C-c C-x C-l never does
> anything on the first headline, e.g., which I think it should.
C-c C-x C-l on the first, or any other, headline toggles LaTeX fragments
in the section (not the subtree) below. If there is nothing to
Andreas Leha writes:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> Andreas Leha writes:
>>
>>> I spoke a little too soon. I still like it, but there is a regression.
>>> See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/95563
>>
>> Indeed. I also fixed a few other things. Here's the update.
>>
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> I spoke a little too soon. I still like it, but there is a regression.
>> See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/95563
>
> Indeed. I also fixed a few other things. Here's the update.
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
Thanks
Andreas Leha writes:
> I spoke a little too soon. I still like it, but there is a regression.
> See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/95563
Indeed. I also fixed a few other things. Here's the update.
Thanks for the feedback.
Regards,
>From f79cd3a0499b1cc1fd9022d958f032d73defea
Hi Nicolas,
Andreas Leha writes:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> Andreas Leha writes:
>>
>>> I am talking about `org-toggle-latex-fragment'. And even if that is
>>> fast, it is very annoying behaviour. I'd very much like to be able to
>>> toggle individual images. In a math-heav
you can open the patch file, see it manually……a little change I think it's
useful.
as to “trailing whitespace”, I’m sorry about this format problem……
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Nick Dokos
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 11:43 PM
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
writes:
writes:
> Hi, buddies:
> a little change has been made……
>
Trying to apply your patch on top of current master, I get:
,
| $ git apply ~/Desktop/0001-again.patch
| /home/nick/Desktop/0001-again.patch:18: trailing whitespace.
| - If the cursor is on the overlay(latex fragment .etc), del
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> I am talking about `org-toggle-latex-fragment'. And even if that is
>> fast, it is very annoying behaviour. I'd very much like to be able to
>> toggle individual images. In a math-heavy document the redisplay of all
>> formula im
Andreas Leha writes:
>> Personally, I never use org-toggle-latex-fragment, but rely on entities,
>> since org-toggle-latex-fragment is only really good for "static/mature"
>> documents.
>
> I am not sure I understand that. What do you mean when you rely on
> entities? Just the replacements for
Hi, buddies:
a little change has been made……
Sent from Windows Mail
From: kuangd...@163.com
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 4:05 AM
To: Nicolas Goaziou
Cc: Andreas Leha, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
I have seen the newest org.el. The request below can be done by the pat
Andreas Leha writes:
> I am talking about `org-toggle-latex-fragment'. And even if that is
> fast, it is very annoying behaviour. I'd very much like to be able to
> toggle individual images. In a math-heavy document the redisplay of all
> formula images of even the current section takes notica
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus writes:
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> I am talking about `org-toggle-latex-fragment'. And even if that is
>> fast, it is very annoying behaviour. I'd very much like to be able to
>> toggle individual images. In a math-heavy document the redisplay of all
>> formula images of ev
writes:
> what if search for ‘org-remove-latex-fragment-image-overlays’ in org.el ? I
> see it in the function ‘org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c’ (org
> 8.2.10)
>
You wouldn't see it if you were using the development version (aka the
master branch).
What Nicolas said is that that no longer happens in the ma
what if search for ‘org-remove-latex-fragment-image-overlays’ in org.el ? I
see it in the function ‘org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c’ (org 8.2.10)
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Nicolas Goaziou
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 1:32 AM
To: kuangd...@163.com
Cc: Andreas Leha, emacs-orgmode@g
writes:
> I'm not sure if the patch proposed may cause any other problems, but
> I think this feature should be added by someone.
Your patch is about C-c C-c, which is no longer related to
`org-toggle-latex-fragment'. So, it cannot be applied.
Regards,
Andreas Leha writes:
> I am talking about `org-toggle-latex-fragment'. And even if that is
> fast, it is very annoying behaviour. I'd very much like to be able to
> toggle individual images. In a math-heavy document the redisplay of all
> formula images of even the current section takes notica
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> I haven't looked at the patch and I do not understand how the patch
>> achieves the removal of single overlays. But I am in the same boat. I
>> also would (usually) like to remove only the rendered formula at the
>> poi
Actually， I’m just talking about ‘org-toggle-latex-fragment’……
I'm not sure if the patch proposed may cause any other problems, but I think
this feature should be added by someone.
Thank you for your guide.
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Nicolas Goaziou
Sent: Friday, February 27
Hello,
Andreas Leha writes:
> I haven't looked at the patch and I do not understand how the patch
> achieves the removal of single overlays. But I am in the same boat. I
> also would (usually) like to remove only the rendered formula at the
> point. I think that this should even be the defaul
writes:
> Here comes the reason:
>
> “C-c C-c” always removes all overlays in org files (such as formulas, images
> .etc )，but sometimes I only want to edit one and leave the others as it is
> (overlay).
>
> so, I modified the org.el .(maybe I should use “advice”……)
>
> Do you think it is des
Here comes the reason:
“C-c C-c” always removes all overlays in org files (such as formulas, images
.etc )，but sometimes I only want to edit one and leave the others as it is
(overlay).
so, I modified the org.el .(maybe I should use “advice”……)
Do you think it is deserved to patch it?
Hello,
writes:
> But how to do it？
Just send it to the list, using "git format-patch" and a proper commit
message. See http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html for more
information.
> Besides， I‘m glad to view your opinions，so here comes the codes：
>
> The place：(defun org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c
25 matches
Mail list logo
