Hi All,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 17:22, Gustavo Barros wrote:
> This is a small feature request for `org-lint' not to hardcode the
> checker functions' prefix, as it currently does.
>
> [...]
>
> However, `org-lint' hardcodes the prefix of the checker functions to its
> own prefix, so that to defi
Hi All,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 17:22, Gustavo Barros
wrote:
This is a small feature request for `org-lint' not to hardcode the
checker
functions' prefix, as it currently does.
I've been playing with and testing this further, and I found an
uncovered corner in my initial suggestion: the r
