Re: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-29 Thread Carsten Dominik
Sorry for only repeating what was said before - I wrote this in an airplane and was not aware how far this thread had gone. You guys had it all figured out. I agree that the best solution is to provide a proper marker in the agenda when something has moved, but only move it with "r". It will wo

Re: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-29 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Sep 28, 2007, at 3:15, Richard G Riley wrote: Two questions: 1) When following the instruction from the following link and rescheduling from the agenda buffer, why do I always get "Item scheduled for nil" in the message bufffer? his is just a bug, fixed now for the next version. 2) Wh

Re: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-28 Thread John Wiegley
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It doesn't really make sense because as you reschedule its easy to forget > which ones you already have rescheduled and end up trying to reschedule an > already rescheduled one. Which is exactly what happened to me. Like other > operations on the agend

Re: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-28 Thread Richard G Riley
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Egli Christian (KIRO 41)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I think the reason is the principle of least surprise. > > Agreed. That's also why rescheduling should perhaps leave some > persistent warning in the agenda buffer (as S-left/right does). > I guess i

Re: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-28 Thread Richard G Riley
"Egli Christian (KIRO 41)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> 2) What is the reason behind having to manually "refresh" after a >> >> reschedule in the agenda buf

Re: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-28 Thread Bastien
"Egli Christian (KIRO 41)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the reason is the principle of least surprise. Agreed. That's also why rescheduling should perhaps leave some persistent warning in the agenda buffer (as S-left/right does). I guess it would solve the issue Richard was concerned ab

Re: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-28 Thread Bastien
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think the reason is to warn you about the modification without having >> to save it. Actually reschedule often happens more than once before you >> need to save the modified buffers, so it makes sense to only save when >> you're done with all the mo

RE: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-28 Thread Egli Christian (KIRO 41)
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> 2) What is the reason behind having to manually "refresh" after a > >> reschedule in the agenda buffer, why does it not do it automatically? > > I think the rea

Re: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-28 Thread Richard G Riley
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> 1) When following the instruction from the following link and >> rescheduling from the agenda buffer, why do I always get >> >> "Item scheduled for nil" in the message bufffer? > > I think this is a bug. > > Try

Re: [Orgmode] resheduling from agenda buffer

2007-09-28 Thread Bastien
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) When following the instruction from the following link and > rescheduling from the agenda buffer, why do I always get > > "Item scheduled for nil" in the message bufffer? I think this is a bug. Try this patch (also fixing small typos.) diff -u /h