Christian Köstlin writes:
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] testing/lisp/test-ob-C.el: Add test for dub support in
> ob-C.el
Canceled, due to no response.
See
https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/CAG741+bUT_Yt3PdLuVpMNH7vo-bb3n1iiynf2Cime1LW=21...@mail.gmail.com/
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode con
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> After adding unit-tests (following in another patchset) I found a bug in my
>> last patch.
>> Sorry for the noise.
>
> Sorry for the very late reply.
>
> If you are still interested, may you please document the new header
> argument in etc/ORG_NEWS and update
> https://o
Christian Köstlin writes:
> After adding unit-tests (following in another patchset) I found a bug in my
> last patch.
> Sorry for the noise.
Sorry for the very late reply.
If you are still interested, may you please document the new header
argument in etc/ORG_NEWS and update
https://orgmode.org
tbanelwebmin writes:
> Your TINYCHANGE fits into the 15 lines limit. I will review it.
>
> As Bastien said, we follow as much as we can a predefined format for commit
> messages:
> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#commit-messages
>
> You may also look at past commit messages, for ins
tbanelwebmin writes:
> For unit-testing Dlang, we could mock the «dub» command (compiler+packager).
> For instance, we could replace it
> by the «cat» Linux command, just while running the unit-test.
>
> But the «cat» command introduces a new dependency on Linux. Is there a
> portable equivalen
For unit-testing Dlang, we could mock the
«dub» command (compiler+packager). For instance, we could replace
it by the «cat» Linux command, just while running the unit-test.
But the «cat» command introduces a new dependency on Linux. Is
there a portable equi
Christian Köstlin writes:
>> If the programming language is using its own package manager, is it any
>> different? Or do you refer to something else?
>>
> Most of the packages that a programming language like rust/crates,
> ruby/rubygems
> or dlang/dub-packages provide will probably never mak
Max Nikulin writes:
> I am unsure concerning general policy related to org-babel test, so the
> following is rather discussion than a direct request to change the test.
>
> Is there a way to avoid dependency on remote resources? My concern is
> test results affected by network issues. In additi
On 02/10/2022 05:05, Christian Köstlin wrote:
Aforementioned unit-test.
+(ert-deftest ob-D/dub-basics ()
+ (if (executable-find "dub") (org-test-at-id
+ "81E17302-BE76-4E2A-93CA-0A7E121CB7C2" (org-babel-next-src-block 1)
+ (should (equal "abc, bac, cab, acb, bca, cb
Aforementioned unit-test.
Kind regards,
Christian
0002-testing-lisp-test-ob-C.el-Add-test-for-dub-support-i.patch
Description: Binary data
After adding unit-tests (following in another patchset) I found a bug in my
last patch.
Sorry for the noise.
Kind regards,
Christian
0001-lisp-ob-C.el-Support-dub-in-ob-D.patch
Description: Binary data
Thanks a lot for you feedbacks!
I rebased my change now, and I hope my changed commit message now conforms
more the the projects standard.
I will send in another patchset including some unittests, if I can get them
to work locally at my machine.
Thanks in advance,
Christian
0001-lisp-ob-C.el-Su
Thanks Christian.
Your TINYCHANGE fits into the 15 lines limit. I
will review it.
As Bastien said, we follow as much as we can a predefined
format for commit messages:
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#commit-messages
You may also l
Hi Christian,
thanks for the patch (you forgot to advertize it by adding [PATCH] in
the subject.)
Christian Köstlin writes:
> Please see the patch comment. I reworked my original patch to fit
> into the TINYPATCH category.
I'm CC'ing Thierry as the maintainer of ob-C.el.
The commit message sh
Please see the patch comment. I reworked my original patch to fit into the
TINYPATCH category.
Kind regards,
Christian
0001-lisp-ob-C.el-Support-dub-dependencies-for-dlang.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi Thierry,
thanks for your feedback and please let me know if I should change
anything to fit
better into the org-mode codebase.
> Easily adding DLang dependencies while keeping a single code block seems
> quite useful.
> I will take a deeper look at your proposal.
> Also, you marked your patc
Thanks Christian for this contribution.
Easily adding DLang dependencies while keeping a single code block seems
quite useful.
I will take a deeper look at your proposal.
Also, you marked your patch as TINYCHANGE, which imply it is less than
15 lines long. However your patch is 24 lines long. Thi
I Hope the patch already contains enough background information why its a
nice feature to have in ob-C.el.
Kind regards,
Christian
0001-lisp-ob-C.el-Support-dub-dependencies-for-dlang.patch
Description: Binary data
18 matches
Mail list logo