[Adding Org ML back to CC]
Sebastian writes:
> Thank you so much for the detailed explanation!
>
> Maybe memory-report is counting what's at the end of the reference, and
> your change fixes it.
memory-report is counting buffer data separately, even when buffer-local
variables reference to the
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> I also wonder if this means the caching is performed by each indirect buffer
>> independently, and doesn't carry over.
>
> Caching is using base buffer actually.
> I guess we can explicitly set reference to the cache root to nil in
> indirect buffers.
Done, on main.
ht
Sebastian Wålinder writes:
> It appears that indirect buffers duplicate the entire org element cache from
> the base buffer whenever created.
Not exactly. Only link to the cache root is copied and some cache
elements may not be garbage-collected.
> Running `memory-report` indicates that each i
Hello!
It appears that indirect buffers duplicate the entire org element cache from
the base buffer whenever created.
Running `memory-report` indicates that each indirect buffer has the same memory
blueprint.
This becomes a massive issue with large org files.
My in my 160 000 line org file, t
