Ihor Radchenko [2022-06-14 Tue 13:17] wrote:
> The Emacs devs reply was that 'right-to-left global setting is preferred
> for such users while nil being preferred setting for other users and it
> should not be something Org decides.
>
> Hence, I just applied a patch removing Org setting
> bidi-par
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I tried to create a large file in Persian, but I cannot see any
> difference in performance when bidi-paragraph-direction is nil or
> 'left-to-right. However, I was able to see a difference using the
> attached file when moving through an artificially created very long li
Daniel Fleischer writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-09/msg00285.html
>
> OK, so 10 years ago on Emacs 24 it might have caused some slowdown on
> large Org files. It wasn't clear if these people needed RTL or not,
> because I set it to nil
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-09/msg00285.html
OK, so 10 years ago on Emacs 24 it might have caused some slowdown on
large Org files. It wasn't clear if these people needed RTL or not,
because I set it to nil as soon as I open my Org files. I gue
Daniel Fleischer writes:
> nil is Emacs default. I don't understand why Org chooses to align
> everything to the left, disregarding any RTL language. Org works great
> with RTL and even with mixed languages, as many people can attest.
See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-09/ms
Hi, in org.el , when defining the mode there's the code
(setq bidi-paragraph-direction 'left-to-right)
which makes everything left-to-right instead of 'nil which smartly
aligns paragraphs either LTR or RTL according to the language of that
paragraph.
nil is Emacs default. I don't understand
