Alessandro Bertulli writes:
> I think I spotted the problem. It's difficult to be sure, but
> apparently, since version 4.31, latexmk automatically detects and run
> biber as a citation engine (see this post
> https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/231351/259874). In fact, in the latexmk
> man page, it
Hi,
I think I spotted the problem. It's difficult to be sure, but
apparently, since version 4.31, latexmk automatically detects and run
biber as a citation engine (see this post
https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/231351/259874). In fact, in the latexmk
man page, it is said to use the option -bibtex t
On Friday, 13 May 2022 at 09:48, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> It's not undocumented; it's poorly documented :-)
I don't that's entirely fair... just a little sparse maybe. ;-) (but
your comment taken as intended)
I've made use of it recently and it had what I needed.
--
: Eric S Fraga, with org relea
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
>> Last thing: I heard that the citation part of the manual is still
>> undocumented. Is this right? If so, do you think what we discovered
>> (especially about manually requiring libraries) may be useful? May I
>> help?
>
> It's not undocumented; it's poorly documented :-
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 9:32 AM Alessandro Bertulli
wrote:
> Last thing: I heard that the citation part of the manual is still
> undocumented. Is this right? If so, do you think what we discovered
> (especially about manually requiring libraries) may be useful? May I
> help?
It's not undocumente
Thanks, I'll mail to mr Collins to inform him then. Thank you all for
your help!
Last thing: I heard that the citation part of the manual is still
undocumented. Is this right? If so, do you think what we discovered
(especially about manually requiring libraries) may be useful? May I
help?
Thank y
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 9:15 AM Alessandro Bertulli
wrote:
...
> So, shall we conclude that latexmk has an issue with correctly
> recognizing natbib and calling bibtex?
Yes!
I just tried it now, and see the same thing. It's weird, because I
don't recall seeing that before.
I'd call that a bug
Ok, I think I got something.
Indeed, setting org-latex-pdf-process to
'("pdflatex -output-directory %o %f"
"bibtex %b" "pdflatex -output-directory %o %f"
"pdflatex -output-directory %o %f")
produces the correct pdf output. I think I have a hint of the reason for
this.
When exporting to a La
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 6:54 AM Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> On Friday, 13 May 2022 at 11:55, Alessandro Bertulli wrote:
> >> Check out org-latex-pdf-process maybe?
> >
> > I don't know the library so in depth, but I'll try, thank you!
>
> I have the following in my init file:
>
> (setq org-latex-pdf-p
On Friday, 13 May 2022 at 11:55, Alessandro Bertulli wrote:
>> Check out org-latex-pdf-process maybe?
>
> I don't know the library so in depth, but I'll try, thank you!
I have the following in my init file:
(setq org-latex-pdf-process '("pdflatex -output-directory %o %f"
> IDK; my version is newer:
>
> Org mode version 9.6 (9.6-??-2bd34edb64 @
> /home/bruce/.config/emacs/.local/straight/build-29.0.50/org/)
I downloaded it from MELPA (since I'm using Emacs 28.1, the one built-in
is 9.5.2).
> I'm using doom, which as you can tell is using straight.
I suppose stra
> For the record, n.d. means "no date" so your BiBTeX entry must be
> missing the year field, for instance.
Actually, it has the field "date". I have read some advice saying that
using "date" over "year", "month" and "day" is encouraged, but searching
online it appears that it is not supported by
On Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 20:31, Alessandro Bertulli wrote:
> displays some annoing "n.d.").
For the record, n.d. means "no date" so your BiBTeX entry must be
missing the year field, for instance.
> After that, if I try again to directly export to pdf, it works. I
> suppose it's a problem in p
Hi Bruce,
thank you for your help. Indeed, loading both functionalities
(require 'oc-biblatex)
(require 'oc-natbib)
did the trick. That's strange, though: my version of Org (get from M-x
org-version) is Org mode version 9.5.3 (9.5.3-g69c588 @
/home/alessandro/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.5.3/). Shouldn't it
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 2:31 PM Alessandro Bertulli
wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
> thank you for your help. Indeed, loading both functionalities
> (require 'oc-biblatex)
> (require 'oc-natbib)
> did the trick. That's strange, though: my version of Org (get from M-x
> org-version) is Org mode version 9.5.3
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:48 AM Alessandro Bertulli
wrote:
>
> Hi again.
>
> After fixing org-ref, I was exploring org-cite and citar. Again, I'm not
> sure how to make everything work. When I try to export to a LaTeX pdf
> file, I got the error "user-error: Unknown processor natbib", despite
> I
Hi again.
After fixing org-ref, I was exploring org-cite and citar. Again, I'm not
sure how to make everything work. When I try to export to a LaTeX pdf
file, I got the error "user-error: Unknown processor natbib", despite
I put the exact header suggested in the manual
(https://orgmode.org/manual/
17 matches
Mail list logo
