TEC writes:
>
> Hence, any and all concerns about feature parity etc. are completely
> resolved. One 'just' needs to implement the bindings and piping (as
> opposed to the whole shebang).
>
Something that I am missing when hacking on org-mode is some form of api
reference. Things like 'org-map-e
Thanks for the warm welcome and the amount of inputs and details that
everybody so fast provides.
I'm really impressed by this community.
Ok seems that delivering a language specification in EBNF has some
challenges that can hardly be addressed due to the nature of org-mode
design, but I read arou
Eric S Fraga writes:
It's not a crazy idea but one which misses one of the best
features of
org mode: it is part of Emacs. For me, a markup language is not
so
exciting: we have plenty of them. What makes org mode powerful
is that
it is infinitely customizable by being part of Emacs. I can
On Thursday, 29 Oct 2020 at 22:12, Mauro Mandracchia wrote:
> Is it a crazy idea if Org-Mode could become a DSL rather than a mode for
> emacs?
It's not a crazy idea but one which misses one of the best features of
org mode: it is part of Emacs. For me, a markup language is not so
exciting: we ha
Hi Mauro,
Welcome! This is definitely not a crazy idea (or at least if it is
then you are in good company).
Org already has wide support as a markup language, and tools like
https://github.com/tecosaur/org-pandoc-import exist that leverage
this,
but the syntax is not standardized and as a resul
Hi everybody 👋
This is my first message to the community, let me first state, I love
*org-mode.*Thanks to the authors and the contributors!
I use *org-mode* everyday, but I don't want to bore you with my stories
about how *org-mode* facilitates my life, just ask if you are interested.
I believe th
