Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2025-02-23 Thread Rudolf Adamkovič
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Note that you can set it to `create-if-interactive'. I do not easily > see why modifying the buffer is something Org should not do, > especially if instructed. Oh, of course! Thank you Ihor, this worked perfectly. Rudy -- "Logic is a science of the necessary laws of

Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2025-02-09 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Rudolf Adamkovič writes: > Actually, I found a problem: If I add a new Emacs Lisp code block to my > literate Emacs configuration, Emacs launches with a blank screen, > asking: > > Buffer ... modified; kill anyway? (yes, no, save and then kill, ?): I am not sure if it is expected or not. > It

Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2025-02-02 Thread Rudolf Adamkovič
Rudolf Adamkovič writes: > Actually, I found a problem: If I add a new Emacs Lisp code block to my > literate Emacs configuration, Emacs launches with a blank screen, > asking: > > Buffer ... modified; kill anyway? (yes, no, save and then kill, ?): With clocks, it gets even weirder: Org asks

Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2025-01-25 Thread Rudolf Adamkovič
Rudolf Adamkovič writes: >> Fixed, on main. >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=f6a0f151b1 > > And it works! Thank you. Actually, I found a problem: If I add a new Emacs Lisp code block to my literate Emacs configuration, Emacs launches with a blank screen, asking

Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2024-12-23 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Rudolf Adamkovič writes: > BTW, I am not sure if this is a known bug, but > > `org-babel-detangle' ignores the comment customizations, > > namely > > - org-babel-tangle-comment-format-beg and > - org-babel-tangle-comment-format-end. > > As a result, the function, more likely than not, > >

Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2024-12-20 Thread Rudolf Adamkovič
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Fixed, on main. > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=f6a0f151b1 Fixed in -3 lines of code. Great job! And it works! Thank you. BTW, I am not sure if this is a known bug, but `org-babel-detangle' ignores the comment customizations, name

Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2024-12-15 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Rudolf Adamkovič writes: > >> Ihor Radchenko writes: >> >>> `org-id-link-to-org-use-id' should be respected once you use :comments >>> link >> >> As of now? It is not. >> >> With `emacs -Q', >> ... > > Confirmed. > This is likely a regression after we moved id: link ha

Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2024-10-29 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Rudolf Adamkovič writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> `org-id-link-to-org-use-id' should be respected once you use :comments >> link > > As of now? It is not. > > With `emacs -Q', > ... Confirmed. This is likely a regression after we moved id: link handling into `org-store-link-functions'. Be

Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2024-10-28 Thread Rudolf Adamkovič
Ihor Radchenko writes: > `org-id-link-to-org-use-id' should be respected once you use :comments > link As of now? It is not. With `emacs -Q', # -*- org-id-link-to-org-use-id: t -*- * Foo :PROPERTIES: :ID: B340C425-D772-4147-8B1A-9E4FE700B5C8 :END: #+BEGIN_SRC

Re: Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2024-10-22 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Rudolf Adamkovič writes: > So, I started (de-)tangling heavily, to get some "IDE" support, and > oh-my, what a buggy mess it is. Not only are tangling comments > super-noisy, the `org-babel-detangle' function is *unreliable*. If > multiple sections have the same title, such as "Implementation",

Noisy and unreliable (de-)tangling

2024-10-21 Thread Rudolf Adamkovič
Howdy! So, I started (de-)tangling heavily, to get some "IDE" support, and oh-my, what a buggy mess it is. Not only are tangling comments super-noisy, the `org-babel-detangle' function is *unreliable*. If multiple sections have the same title, such as "Implementation", it leads to *data loss*.