Hi Ihor,
Thank you for resurfacing this. I'll keep an eye out for the other
threads. I've been preoccupied with trying to wrap up my PhD work so
have been (and will continue to be for a bit longer) focused on other
things. I'll be back to focus on many of these questions some time in
the late wi
Hi Ihor,
> I have addressed the most important comments that should be resolved
> before the coming Org release.
>
> See the attached patches.
>
> I will merge them if there are no objections.
Thanks for getting to this, I really appreciate you picking up the slack with
this 😀.
All the best,
Tim
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Will it be enough?
As long as we can point to a thread that contains all the information
and pointers that allows to quickly read Tim's comments, yes, fine.
--
Bastien
Bastien Guerry writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> I will merge them if there are no objections.
>
> Thanks! No objections. (Sorry I moved org-syntax.org from worg/dev/
> to worg/ right before reading this email, I hope that's okay.)
Apparently git is smart enough to rebase my commits onto
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I will merge them if there are no objections.
Thanks! No objections. (Sorry I moved org-syntax.org from worg/dev/
to worg/ right before reading this email, I hope that's okay.)
Perhaps, on top of removing Tim's comments from org-syntax.org we can
store them in a dedic
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Below, I am listing my further feedback on the document.
> I encourage other Org users to look into it as well.
> This is one of the big projects that need to be finished as a
> prerequisite for registering Org format in RFC:
I have addressed the most important comments
Hi,
It has been a while since I looked into the Org syntax document at
https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html. So, I am not again ready
to see and comment on things with a fresh eye.
Below, I am listing my further feedback on the document.
I encourage other Org users to look into it as well
