Re: Faces for inline src blocks

2021-12-02 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Thursday, 2 Dec 2021 at 23:56, Timothy wrote: > [...] but something like 6 faces for inline source blocks just feels > excessive to me. Why? It's just a number. I cannot imagine it would have any performance impact? If you think that level of granularity is useful, I suggest you go for it

Re: Faces for inline src blocks

2021-12-02 Thread Timothy
Hi Eric, > I am not very picky (yeah, well, okay, maybe a little 😉). All I really > care about is not having other faces, that have well defined meanings, > being used. I would actually be happy with just the whole block having > a face but maybe others, including yourself, would like to disting

Re: Faces for inline src blocks

2021-12-02 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Thursday, 2 Dec 2021 at 21:57, Timothy wrote: > Let me know what your thoughts are. I am not very picky (yeah, well, okay, maybe a little 😉). All I really care about is not having other faces, that have well defined meanings, being used. I would actually be happy with just the whole block ha

Faces for inline src blocks (was: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks)

2021-12-02 Thread Timothy
Hi Eric, > However, I am finding the result not very pleasing unfortunately. > Specifically, I am not happy with the use of other pre-existing faces > (shadow and org-meta-line) for this purpose. These other faces have > their specific uses and the resulting combination for inline src blocks, > f