Re: Emacs launched from Firefox

2022-06-01 Thread Max Nikulin
On 26/05/2022 09:59, Ihor Radchenko wrote: Samuel Wales writes: so idk why ff makes emacs not load .emacs or does an xterm. /usr/bin/emacs results in indeed emacs25 atm. Since you have not found a way to reproduce the issue in a month, I assume that you do not severely suffer from the proble

Re: Emacs launched from Firefox

2022-05-25 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Samuel Wales writes: > so idk why ff makes emacs not load .emacs or does an xterm. > /usr/bin/emacs results in indeed emacs25 atm. > > gnome and kde are too heavy for my computer, and they can't do > everything fluxbox can, and fluxbox mostly wfm. i don't get what > things de's do that i need, b

Re: Emacs launched from Firefox

2022-05-25 Thread Samuel Wales
thank you for that /very/ useful information. cannot seem to reproduce at this time as i'd have to narrow down the dialog box in which this occurs [i think on a save link in gmail with some extensions or so is one place] for haelth reasons but i think part of the problem is that .emacs is not call

Re: Emacs launched from Firefox

2022-05-02 Thread Max Nikulin
On 02/05/2022 09:03, Samuel Wales wrote: thank you. there is no emacs in my ~/.config/mimeapps.list. where are those desktop files found or put? i use fluxbox. [i realize this is not org related. non-list email ok.] Perhaps emacs-help is more suitable for this discussion, but I do not read

Re: Emacs launched from Firefox

2022-05-01 Thread Samuel Wales
thank you. there is no emacs in my ~/.config/mimeapps.list. where are those desktop files found or put? i use fluxbox. [i realize this is not org related. non-list email ok.] On 5/1/22, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 01/05/2022 11:53, Samuel Wales wrote: >> >> [firefox did not offer to allow a comm

Emacs launched from Firefox

2022-05-01 Thread Max Nikulin
On 01/05/2022 11:53, Samuel Wales wrote: [firefox did not offer to allow a command line to run my shell script which sets up emacs correctly, and idk if it even ran with my .emacs. does it do -q? not sure because emacs is too unusable to even find that out. so firefox fails to be accessible in