Hello,
Kyle Meyer writes:
> You could use floor's DIVISOR argument:
>
> (floor (- (org-time-stamp-to-now ts t)) 60)
Good catch! I keep forgetting about this argument.
I added tests, mentioned the change in ORG-NEWS, and applied the patch.
I hesitated using the UPDOWN optional argument fro
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> WDYT?
Makes sense to me. I have one nitpick on the actual change:
> + ;; Shift starting date to today, or now if
> + ;; repeater is by hours.
> + (if (equal what "h")
> + (org-timestamp-change
Hello,
Someone on #org-mode (sorry, I cannot remember the nickname) reported
that ".+" repeater style was not handling properly (not handling at all,
actually) hours spans.
As a reminder, ".+" means "repeat, starting from today as the base
date". With hours, it seems logical to "repeat, starting
