Ihor Radchenko writes:
> alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
>
>> I fear that, even if the emacs people fix the problem, it still won't
>> work with, say, emacs 27 or 28.
>>
>> Oh, well...
>
> If they fix this, we will at least have a clue what is causing it.
The bug has been fixed for Emacs 29.
Ea
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> I fear that, even if the emacs people fix the problem, it still won't
> work with, say, emacs 27 or 28.
>
> Oh, well...
If they fix this, we will at least have a clue what is causing it.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org
Ihor Radchenko writes on Sun 1 Jan 2023 14:13:
> It is indeed Org 9.6 issue. Likely related to some obscure
> interaction between what Org does and `combine-after-change-calls'.
>
> Note that I am reporting for Emacs master, which ships with Org
> 9.6.
I'm afraid it is a bit complicated fo
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> > Confirmed.
> >
> > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60467
>
> Funny: since the problem was not present in previous versions of org,
> I would have thought it was an org 9.6 issue...
It is indeed Org 9.6 issue. Likely related to some obscure in
> Confirmed.
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60467
Funny: since the problem was not present in previous versions of org,
I would have thought it was an org 9.6 issue...
--
EOST (École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre)
ITE (Institut Terre & Environnement) | alain.
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> Under release_9.6-173-g24740a
>
> I have file
>
> #+begin_src org
> ,* h1
> ,** h2
> #+end_src
>
> I do
>
>M-x org-promote-subtree
>
> on h2, which works as expected; then
>
>M-x undo
> ...
> and I have the message
>
>primitive-undo: Changes to be und
Under release_9.6-173-g24740a
I have file
#+begin_src org
,* h1
,** h2
#+end_src
I do
M-x org-promote-subtree
on h2, which works as expected; then
M-x undo
The file becomes
#+begin_src org
,* h1
,** * h2
#+end_src
and I have the message
primitive-undo: Changes to be undone by f
