Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> I do wonder if the idea of a document classification model and some form
>> of heuristic algorithms to handle default document classification might
>> be useful.
>
> I do not think that we need to go in this direction.
> I doubt that we are qualified to get the heuristic
Tim Cross writes:
>> 1. Introduce a new customization `org-confirm-evaluate-safe-regexps'
>>listing regexps that are considered safe or cons cells
>>(src-body/header-arg/table/macro/diary . regexp)
>>
>> 2. Introduce a new customization `org-confirm-evaluate' that can be set
>>to t/ni
Greg Minshall writes:
> one additional item (i don't *think* we discussed this before; apologies
> if i'm forgetting): tangling. if one is prompted to "merely" tangle ...
>
> #+begin_src sh :tangle /var/tmp/foo.org.tangled
> echo 'hi!'
> #+end_src
>
>
> one could imagine more siniste
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> P.S. Considering intense discussion around the topic, what about
>> reverting my commit from the release? We can then re-consider the whole
>> design and apply something more elaborate later.
>
> I now reverted the discussed commit.
> https:
Ihor,
thanks for this.
one additional item (i don't *think* we discussed this before; apologies
if i'm forgetting): tangling. if one is prompted to "merely" tangle ...
#+begin_src sh :tangle /var/tmp/foo.org.tangled
echo 'hi!'
#+end_src
one could imagine more sinister scenarios for
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> P.S. Considering intense discussion around the topic, what about
> reverting my commit from the release? We can then re-consider the whole
> design and apply something more elaborate later.
I now reverted the discussed commit.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-
