Marvin Gülker writes:
> The example given by Christian Moe contains an error; you need to
> repeat the “cite:” keyword again for each chain of citations.
Oops, yes, apologies, To be clear, that was of course what I did when
testing, and why the testing worked.
(For illustrative purposes I subst
Am 16. April 2025 um 12:29 Uhr -0400 schrieb Zac E:
I should add that exporting to PDF
via LaTeX is the main use-case for those requiring any
of this functionality.
I disagree. I export excessively to ODT with footnote-based citation
styles, because the legal publishers I need to work with onl
Christian, thank you for those suggestions. There are two
major problems with trying to resolve this via the use of
explicit footnotes, whether in-line or at the document’s end.
In both cases, when exporting to PDF via LaTeX, the
second reference will not be recognized as a reference
at all. Ins
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Zac E writes:
>
[cite:@cohen2003consum-repub.;@trentmann2016empire-things]
>
>>> This is ambiguous. "." can be a part of citation key.
>>> There is no bug here. Just a limitation that we cannot easily force end
>>> of citation key in Org syntax.
[...]
>> It is absolu
I understand what you mean. I think that the reason
Pandoc has disallowed putting periods at the end of citekeys
is that it truly does not represent a behavior that any users
engage in, and disallowing it massively simplifies the Markdown
or org syntax of a very common procedure: putting a period
[ Moving discussion to Org mailing list, where it belongs ]
Zac E writes:
>>> [cite:@cohen2003consum-repub.;@trentmann2016empire-things]
>> This is ambiguous. "." can be a part of citation key.
>> There is no bug here. Just a limitation that we cannot easily force end
>> of citation key in Org
