Uwe,
> Thanks but I have to disappoint you the correct result should be 10.1
ah, well. :)
i realized you probably wanted the table back. below it is, with your
explanation of "@3$3".
> Thanks I will play around a bit, but for the moment I think I have to
> stick with calc
well, takes all kin
>>> "GM" == Greg Minshall writes:
Greg
> Uwe,
> well, *i* no longer remember how to read calc-like expressions. and,
> i'm a notoriously poor R coders. assuredly the following is not doing
> what you want, but possibly you'll get the idea. (if 102.01 is, indeed,
> the correct answer, feel fr
Uwe,
well, *i* no longer remember how to read calc-like expressions. and,
i'm a notoriously poor R coders. assuredly the following is not doing
what you want, but possibly you'll get the idea. (if 102.01 is, indeed,
the correct answer, feel free to buy me a hot fudge sundae some day. :)
cheers
On Wednesday, 7 Jul 2021 at 09:01, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Out of curiosity do you have an example of using R to generate stuff
> like this.
I don't; sorry. I don't use R myself directly although my PhD students
do. Others on this list have quite a bit of experience with R so maybe
somebody else ca
>>> "ESF" == Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Monday, 5 Jul 2021 at 16:48, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> Well I do that myself basically, but my main problem is now: *formulas*, I
>> have to collaborate with colleagues using excel and I have to work with
>> their formulas in a way or another.
> Tell them to u