Hi Matt,
> However, I noticed that there appears to be another (large) patch in the
> works that also does this (email subject line “Overhaul of the LaTeX
> preview system”). That’s a long thread and I haven’t followed it. Is
> there still scope for my change? Is it worth getting this in?
So, in
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Matt Huszagh writes:
>
>> These are nice ideas, and ones I hadn't considered. Thanks for the
>> suggestions! I'll think about it a bit and may modify the patch
>> accordingly.
>
> May I ask if you further considered changing the patch?
Hey Ihor,
I'm sorry for the late
Matt Huszagh writes:
> These are nice ideas, and ones I hadn't considered. Thanks for the
> suggestions! I'll think about it a bit and may modify the patch
> accordingly.
May I ask if you further considered changing the patch?
Best,
Ihor
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> My mistake. For some reason, I had thought that
> =\documentclass[preview]{standalone}= was used by default for LaTeX
> previews. Setting it as described in your patch, it now works
> properly, even with the default value of =dvisvgm=.
No worries; glad you got it worki
