Re: [PATCH 2/2] org-refile.el: Fix test case

2021-05-11 Thread Maxim Nikulin
On 09/05/2021 23:05, satotake wrote: * lisp/org-refile.el (org-refile-get-targets): Check `buffer-file-name' return value instead of `buffer-base-buffer'. To pass the related tests, we need to check `buffer-file-name'. Thank you for the patches. Maybe I have missed something, but it seems 2 p

[PATCH 2/2] org-refile.el: Fix test case

2021-05-09 Thread satotake
* lisp/org-refile.el (org-refile-get-targets): Check `buffer-file-name' return value instead of `buffer-base-buffer'. To pass the related tests, we need to check `buffer-file-name'. TINYCHANGE --- lisp/org-refile.el | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 2/2] org-refile.el: Fix test case

2021-05-09 Thread satotake
* lisp/org-refile.el (org-refile-get-targets): Check `buffer-file-name' return value instead of `buffer-base-buffer'. To pass the related tests, we need to check `buffer-file-name'. TINYCHANGE --- lisp/org-refile.el | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 2/2] org-refile.el: Fix test case

2021-05-09 Thread satotake
* lisp/org-refile.el (org-refile-get-targets): Check `buffer-file-name' return value instead of `buffer-base-buffer'. To pass the related tests, we need to check `buffer-file-name'. TINYCHANGE --- lisp/org-refile.el | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git