Jack Kamm writes:
> For convenience I attach these as separate patches here. If it looks
> OK I will squash with the prior patch before applying to main.
Approved.
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Would it make sense to throw a warning instead of silently skipping ~++~
> and ~.+~ repeaters?
>
> I think it would make sense to link to this variable in the
> `org-icalendar-use-scheduled' docstring and possibly in the manual.
Thanks, I agree. I've updated the patch t
Jack Kamm writes:
> I am attaching an updated patch for ox-icalendar unscheduled and
> repeating TODOs, incorporating some of Ihor's feedback to my RFC some
> months ago.
Thanks! See some comments below.
> +*** New option ~org-icalendar-todo-unscheduled-start~ to control unscheduled
> TODOs in
Hello,
I am attaching an updated patch for ox-icalendar unscheduled and
repeating TODOs, incorporating some of Ihor's feedback to my RFC some
months ago.
Compared to my original RFC, here are the main changes:
- For unscheduled TODOs with repeating deadline, the deadline warning
days is used a
