Timothy writes:
> Hi pillule, should we consider this patch cancelled?
It is already :)
--
Bastien
Hi pillule, should we consider this patch cancelled?
pillule writes:
> You are right I clearly missed org-src-ask-before-returning-to-edit-buffer
> Don't know how . . .
>
> Sorry for the noise.
You are right I clearly missed
org-src-ask-before-returning-to-edit-buffer
Don't know how . . .
Sorry for the noise.
Kyle Meyer writes:
Thanks for the patch.
pillule writes:
Hi, it is asked to the user if we want to revert changes when
re-entering in a org-source buffer.
Even if the
Thanks for the patch.
pillule writes:
> Hi, it is asked to the user if we want to revert changes when
> re-entering in a org-source buffer.
> Even if the buffer have no modifications.
Hmm, that description seems to be focusing on the prompt's parenthetical
note. When org-src-ask-before-returni
hm I hope this is better.²
Hi, it is asked to the user if we want to revert changes when
re-entering in a
org-source buffer.
Even if the buffer have no modifications.
This patch ask to revert the buffer only if there are
modifications to the
source buffer.
@@ -493,8 +493,9 @@
(old-edit
hm I hope this is better.
Hi, it is asked to the user if we want to revert changes when
re-entering in a
org-source buffer.
Even if the buffer have no modifications.
This patch ask to revert the buffer only if there are
modifications to the
source buffer.
@@ -493,8 +493,9 @@
(ol
Hi, it is asked to the user if we want to revert changes when
re-entering in a org-source buffer.
Even if the buffer have no modifications.
This patch ask to revert the buffer only if there are
modifications to the source buffer.
@@ -493,8 +493,9 @@
(old-edit-buffer (org-src--edit
