On 6/8/22 09:30, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Nick Dokos writes:
LGTM! Is there any reason you did not push the patch upstream yourself?
ISTR I used to have push access to the repo, but in some repo move I
think I've lost it and I've never arranged to get it back. At least, I
*think* that was the c
Nick Dokos writes:
>> LGTM! Is there any reason you did not push the patch upstream yourself?
>>
>
> ISTR I used to have push access to the repo, but in some repo move I
> think I've lost it and I've never arranged to get it back. At least, I
> *think* that was the case - but perhaps given my gen
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
>> `C-u M-x org-lint' was failing to run any checkers, no matter what
>> category was chosen, because the calculation of the list of checkers
>> always returned `nil'.
>
> LGTM! Is there any reason you did not push the patch upstream yourself?
>
IST
Nick Dokos writes:
> `C-u M-x org-lint' was failing to run any checkers, no matter what
> category was chosen, because the calculation of the list of checkers
> always returned `nil'.
LGTM! Is there any reason you did not push the patch upstream yourself?
Best,
Ihor
-0400
Subject: [PATCH] org-lint: Fix invocation with C-u prefix argument
* lisp/org-lint.el (org-lint): Fix the order of the arguments in
the `assoc-string' call when calculating the list of checkers to
invoke.
`C-u M-x org-lint' was failing to run any checkers, no matter what
category
