Nick Daly writes:
> Yes, I can confirm that `org-babel-plantuml-post-process` is not
> necessary for the second patch. That was a line accidentally left over
> from the first, larger, patch.
Thanks Nick for confirming.
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
> Nick Daly writes:
>
>> +(org-babel-plantuml-post-process out-file)
>
> Note that I had to remove the line above from your second patch.
>
> Can you confirm it is not necessary for your second patch to work?
Yes, I can confirm that `org-babel-plantuml-post-proc
Hi Nick,
Nick Daly writes:
> +(org-babel-plantuml-post-process out-file)
Note that I had to remove the line above from your second patch.
Can you confirm it is not necessary for your second patch to work?
Thanks,
--
Bastien
Hi Nick,
Nick Daly writes:
> Nick Daly writes:
>
>> Please see the attached patch that allows for post-processing of
>> PlantUML diagrams based on the exported file extension.
>
> If the above patch was too generic and heavy-weight for consideration,
> please see this alternative, simpler, patch
Nick Daly writes:
> Please see the attached patch that allows for post-processing of
> PlantUML diagrams based on the exported file extension.
If the above patch was too generic and heavy-weight for consideration,
please see this alternative, simpler, patch. It just adds a flag that,
when enable
up somewhere as the previous
emails never appeared on the list.
Thanks for your time,
Nick
>From 527610e8a415a45bffac53b9b508b472311627c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Daly
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:48:03 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ob-plantuml: Add PlantUML block post-processing.
* lisp/
