Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I have no further comments.
> Feel free to push.
Applied. Thanks for your help and review!
Jack Kamm writes:
> For the NEWS entry, I actually just modified the previous NEWS entry for
> `org-babel-comint-async-register' since there is so much overlap. But
> let me know if it would be better to have a separate NEWS entry for
> each.
> ...
> Since it can be confusing to have 2 different
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Thanks!
> I think that we need to do the same things as with your
> `org-babel-comint-async-register' patch: (1) ORG-NEWS; (2) possibly use
> more descriptive values.
I'm attaching an updated patch with NEWS entry and more descriptive
values for the prompt handling, cons
Jack Kamm writes:
> I've reattached the patch with this option removed, and also rebased
> onto latest main.
Thanks!
I think that we need to do the same things as with your
`org-babel-comint-async-register' patch: (1) ORG-NEWS; (2) possibly use
more descriptive values.
> - ;; Filter out
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Previously, the point was always at process-mark when BODY is
> called. Now, it may not be the case. It may cause problems.
On the one hand -- I'm not sure I agree that it would cause
problems. IMO setting point to process mark goes hand-in-hand with
cutting the dangling
Jack Kamm writes:
> This is related to my recent thread,
>
> https://list.orgmode.org/87wmi9etku@gmail.com/T/#m93bd964243638ee358d4375c9ed4f40e066238d4
>
> which addresses problems with prompt filtering of R and python async
> evaluation in Org 9.7.
>
> Here, I address the non-async case.
>
This is related to my recent thread,
https://list.orgmode.org/87wmi9etku@gmail.com/T/#m93bd964243638ee358d4375c9ed4f40e066238d4
which addresses problems with prompt filtering of R and python async evaluation
in Org 9.7.
Here, I address the non-async case.
First, I introduce options to `org