Max Nikulin writes:
> Do you have any arguments against switching from emacs -Q to emacs -q? I
> am still unsure if it is safe enough, but not doing it is not better. I
> am considering adding -q to this script when it is called directly.
> Unfortunately Emacs does not have an option to overri
On 04/05/2023 17:24, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
For those who are not familiar with convention any target may be
specified in docs, keeping usual meaning of the default "all" target.
I am mostly concerned about the existing users who are already settled
on running the default "m
Max Nikulin writes:
>> Good idea. Although, we should not overdo this package management thing.
>> If we really need complex functionality here, we should better just use
>> cask/eldev instead of re-inventing the wheel.
>
> I have not tried cask or eldev, so I can not reason on supposed workflow.
ot include it
What does this comment refer to?
To lack of my experience with package.el and site-lisp infrastructure.From 6e0d73abf527901df080f0f5d7d272722d89c87a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Max Nikulin
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 18:39:49 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] epm.el: A CLI tool for package.el
* mk/epm.el: A helper
