Ihor Radchenko writes:
> And they reverted the warning at the end.
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit?id=d51de0c5d90117bc1dc4bc5bc700253d71cd4579
Yes, it makes sense.
--
Bastien Guerry
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> ⛔ Warning (lexical-binding): File
>> /home/bzg/.emacs.d/org-clock-save.el lacks `lexical-binding'
>> directive on its first line
>>
>> The attached patch should fix this. Is it okay to add it to bugfix?
>
> I think that it is premature.
> This is a warning recentl
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I think that it is premature.
> This is a warning recently introduced on Emacs master, and it is still
> being debated upon. See
> https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/50e29988-d354-4d10-990f-31828dbe6...@gmail.com/t/#u
Okay, fair enough.
--
Bastien Guerry
Bastien writes:
> Recent versions of Emacs complain about org-clock-save.el:
>
> ⛔ Warning (lexical-binding): File
> /home/bzg/.emacs.d/org-clock-save.el lacks `lexical-binding'
> directive on its first line
>
> The attached patch should fix this. Is it okay to add it to bugfix?
I think t
Recent versions of Emacs complain about org-clock-save.el:
⛔ Warning (lexical-binding): File
/home/bzg/.emacs.d/org-clock-save.el lacks `lexical-binding'
directive on its first line
The attached patch should fix this. Is it okay to add it to bugfix?
Thanks,
--
Bastien
diff --git a/lisp
