I am replying here because the original reply did not go into my inbox.
Matt Huszagh writes:
>> I'd like to request other people who use export and source blocks
>> extensively to try the patch and see if it breaks anything.
>>
>> Meanwhile, could you please reword the commit message and make it
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Thanks for the patch! And sorry for the late reply.
No worries for the delay - I know you have a lot of these. Thanks for
the review.
> Your explanation is quite confusing, but I think I managed to understand
> what you referred to:
>
> --
> We can write the simple
Matt Huszagh writes:
> + ;; We deliberately do not insert a newline here since there are
> + ;; valid cases in which a user does not want a blank line between a
> + ;; results block and the subsequent text.
>(beginning-of-line 0)
>(when hash (org-babel-hide-hash)))
Thanks for the patc
Inserting this newline prevents a valid use-case and protects against
an edge-case that is completely avoidable without the additional
guarantee it provides. The original intention for inserting the
newline was to avoid the edge case in which a user does not insert a
newline between a source block
