Ihor Radchenko writes:
> So, the attached patch is changing the priority of the parsing.
> Maybe Nicolas knows some tricky cases when the patch makes things wrong,
> but those cases are certainly not covered by tests.
No objections.
Applied, onto main, adding ORG-NEWS entry.
https://git.savannah
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> However, thinking about it more, I feel that prioritising underline
> should work better. The underline parser recently got changed into a
> stricter version. Now, only underlines starting after spaces,-,(,',",
> and { are recognised as an underlines.
>
> So, the attached
Juan Manuel Macías writes:
>> The priority appears to be intentional.
>
> I see. But then the compatibility with the rest of the emphasis is
> broken. I mean, the user would expect things like (_underline_) will be
> exported as (\uline{underline}), in the same way that (/emphasis/) is
> exported
