Response below/inline for email Visuwesh wrote:
> (original email sent 13 Dec 2024 at 16:36)
>
> However, when we have something like
>
> x := 3
> a := 2 * x
> x := 2
> z := 0.5 * x
>
> | 1 | |
> #+TBLFM:$2=$x*$z
>
> what should $2 evaluate to? $z is straight-forward: $z=1
[வெள்ளி டிசம்பர் 13, 2024] Fraga, Eric wrote:
> Response below/inline for email Visuwesh wrote:
>> (original email sent 13 Dec 2024 at 14:32)
>>
>> Update x := 3 and y first. Then update `a' and `z'. `z' will be 10.6.
>> Now update x := 2, and update `z' and `a'. `z' updates to 5.4 as shown
>>
Response below/inline for email Visuwesh wrote:
> (original email sent 13 Dec 2024 at 14:32)
>
> Update x := 3 and y first. Then update `a' and `z'. `z' will be 10.6.
> Now update x := 2, and update `z' and `a'. `z' updates to 5.4 as shown
> above but `a' remains 9!
Yes, this is expected beh
[வெள்ளி டிசம்பர் 13, 2024] Visuwesh wrote:
> [...]
> Some caveats:
>
> 1. You need to ensure that all the calc-embedded variables that you
> use in the formula need to be active and evaluated beforehand.
> 2. The calc-embedded var is considered at last after everything else
> in org-
Sorry for getting back after so long!
[புதன் ஏப்ரல் 03, 2024] Fraga, Eric wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 Mar 2024 at 18:34, Visuwesh wrote:
>>> Specifically, I would love to make reference to calc variables,
>>> especially those defined using embedded calc, in org tables.
>>
>> Can you please provide a
On Saturday, 30 Mar 2024 at 18:34, Visuwesh wrote:
>> Specifically, I would love to make reference to calc variables,
>> especially those defined using embedded calc, in org tables.
>
> Can you please provide a minimal example for me to play around with? I
> realise I would like something like thi
[திங்கள் மார்ச் 18, 2024] Fraga, Eric wrote:
Good day, Eric!
> Thank you for this. Potentially very useful.
>
> As you have managed to understand calc internals (to a much greater
> degrees than I have ever managed), do you know if there is any way to go
> the other way? Specifically, I would l
On Monday, 18 Mar 2024 at 20:59, Visuwesh wrote:
> You give me far too credit: I merely placed an edebug trigger for
> calc-push-list and used a simple-minded ' [1,2,3;4,5,6] RET to figure
> out the vector format (then later I found the commentary).
Cute!
> If I get the time, I will try to look i
[திங்கள் மார்ச் 18, 2024] Fraga, Eric wrote:
> Thank you for this. Potentially very useful.
>
> As you have managed to understand calc internals (to a much greater
> degrees than I have ever managed), do you know if there is any way to go
> the other way? Specifically, I would love to make refer
Thank you for this. Potentially very useful.
As you have managed to understand calc internals (to a much greater
degrees than I have ever managed), do you know if there is any way to go
the other way? Specifically, I would love to make reference to calc
variables, especially those defined using
[சனி மார்ச் 16, 2024] Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Visuwesh writes:
>
>> Subject: [PATCH] ob-calc.el: Add support for tables in Calc source block :var
>
> Thanks!
> Applied, onto main.
> I modified the patch to enable ob-calc tests by default.
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/com
Visuwesh writes:
> Subject: [PATCH] ob-calc.el: Add support for tables in Calc source block :var
Thanks!
Applied, onto main.
I modified the patch to enable ob-calc tests by default.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=89b0773c3
>> Would you mind using `org-test-with-
[சனி மார்ச் 16, 2024] Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Visuwesh writes:
>
>> Attached patch adds support for passing tables as matrices (or vector)
>> to a Calc source block through the :var parameter. There might be a
>> better way to do it than manually construct the data structure expected
>> by Calc
Visuwesh writes:
> Attached patch adds support for passing tables as matrices (or vector)
> to a Calc source block through the :var parameter. There might be a
> better way to do it than manually construct the data structure expected
> by Calc for a matrix but given that it rarely sees changes i
Attached patch adds support for passing tables as matrices (or vector)
to a Calc source block through the :var parameter. There might be a
better way to do it than manually construct the data structure expected
by Calc for a matrix but given that it rarely sees changes in this area,
it shouldn't b
15 matches
Mail list logo
