Re: [PATCH] Accept nil outline path for file+olp+datetree org-capture-templates target

2025-07-12 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Kristoffer Balintona writes: > I did, yes. I want to confirm because I wasn't quite sure which > direction you were trying to nudge me toward: would you like me to > ensure that the behavior introduced by the patch works well with > :prepend? Sorry for the delay. I wanted to make sure that your

Re: [PATCH] Accept nil outline path for file+olp+datetree org-capture-templates target

2025-06-20 Thread Kristoffer Balintona
Thanks for the bump. Life stuff popped up and I got distracted by other hacking too. On Thu, Jun 19 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >>> Thank you for the clarification. WDYT of the patches attached? >> >> See my comments below. >> ... > > It has been a month. > Kristoffer,

Re: [PATCH] Accept nil outline path for file+olp+datetree org-capture-templates target

2025-06-19 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: >> Thank you for the clarification. WDYT of the patches attached? > > See my comments below. > ... It has been a month. Kristoffer, did you have a chance to look into my comments? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at

Re: [PATCH] Accept nil outline path for file+olp+datetree org-capture-templates target

2025-05-18 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Kristoffer Balintona writes: > I apologize for the delay. I've been busy these last few days and also > encountered some technical difficulties with my device. No problem. We are all volunteers here, contributing in our free time. > Thank you for the clarification. WDYT of the patches attached?

Re: [PATCH] Accept nil outline path for file+olp+datetree org-capture-templates target

2025-05-15 Thread Kristoffer Balintona
Hi Ihor, I apologize for the delay. I've been busy these last few days and also encountered some technical difficulties with my device. On Sun, May 11 2025, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Kristoffer Balintona writes: > >>> Why not just using nil value as you initially suggested? >> >> Currently, both