> Carsten Dominik writes:
> On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
>>> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
On 15Nov2007, at 12:45 PM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
How about someone stepping forward and trying to release an XEmacs
package containing noutline.el and org-mode? Anyone who feels up to
this? Because I will not have the time.
I'm already maintaing XEmacs for cygwin. I will give it a try a
On 13Nov2007, at 11:50 PM, Wes Nakamura wrote:
| On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
| > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
| > easier, but on this other hand it will not w
On 14Nov2007, at 12:17 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On 13Nov2007, at 11:50 PM, Wes Nakamura wrote:
| On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
| > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks
| On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
| > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
| > easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
| >
| > Sometimes I wander how many X
On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmac
Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
Another XEmacs user raising his hand -- please keep XEmacs compatibility.
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hirgel
Hi,
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
> still worth supporting it
I definitely think it is. (Although I'm currently giving Gnu Emacs
another try after years of XEmacs-induced productivity ;-)
Regards,
Stefan
-
> Carsten Dominik writes:
> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there,
On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
>
> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users ar
Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
still worth supporting it
-
Dear all,
[a suggestion]
I seem to recall some time ago there were some discussions about undo
changes. for example, if I archive a subtree and then undo, the archived
substree will be restored to its original .org file but is also archived
in the _archive.org file. i.e. the undo is incomplete.
12 matches
Mail list logo