Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-15 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Carsten Dominik writes: > On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote: >> On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented >>> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-15 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 15Nov2007, at 12:45 PM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: How about someone stepping forward and trying to release an XEmacs package containing noutline.el and org-mode? Anyone who feels up to this? Because I will not have the time. I'm already maintaing XEmacs for cygwin. I will give it a try a

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 13Nov2007, at 11:50 PM, Wes Nakamura wrote: | On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented | > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much | > easier, but on this other hand it will not w

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 14Nov2007, at 12:17 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: On 13Nov2007, at 11:50 PM, Wes Nakamura wrote: | On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented | > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-13 Thread Wes Nakamura
| On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented | > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much | > easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs. | > | > Sometimes I wander how many X

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-13 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote: On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmac

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-13 Thread Ed Hirgelt
Tim O'Callaghan wrote: If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it into an Emacs only tool IMHO. Another XEmacs user raising his hand -- please keep XEmacs compatibility. Thanks, Ed -- Ed Hirgel

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-13 Thread Stefan Kamphausen
Hi, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is > still worth supporting it I definitely think it is. (Although I'm currently giving Gnu Emacs another try after years of XEmacs-induced productivity ;-) Regards, Stefan -

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-13 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Carsten Dominik writes: > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much > easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs. > Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there,

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-13 Thread Tim O'Callaghan
On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much > easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs. > > Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users ar

Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-13 Thread Carsten Dominik
Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs. Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is still worth supporting it -

[Orgmode] undo in org.el

2007-11-12 Thread Leo
Dear all, [a suggestion] I seem to recall some time ago there were some discussions about undo changes. for example, if I archive a subtree and then undo, the archived substree will be restored to its original .org file but is also archived in the _archive.org file. i.e. the undo is incomplete.