On 06/21/2007 02:29 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 19:36, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
>
>> Carsten,
>>
>> I like this new syntax better too.
>>
>> I can't find it in the manual now, but I think the following syntax,
>> which is nearly as simple, was supported (I use it regularly):
On Jun 19, 2007, at 19:36, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
Carsten,
I like this new syntax better too.
I can't find it in the manual now, but I think the following syntax,
which is nearly as simple, was supported (I use it regularly):
*** Meeting 15:30-17:00 <2007-06-13 Wed>
This is correct, but o
Carsten,
I like this new syntax better too.
I can't find it in the manual now, but I think the following syntax,
which is nearly as simple, was supported (I use it regularly):
*** Meeting 15:30-17:00 <2007-06-13 Wed>
In the agenda, the time is stripped but the date is not. Although I
prefer th
On Jun 15, 2007, at 16:14, NL wrote:
On 6/15/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This should work out of the box and usually does.
What exactly does your entry look like?
It is like:
*** Meeting <2007-06-13 Wed 15:30-17:00>
This is an as yet unsupported way to write a block of
On 6/15/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This should work out of the box and usually does.
What exactly does your entry look like?
It is like:
*** Meeting <2007-06-13 Wed 15:30-17:00>
Michael
On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:52, Michael wrote:
>
> Right now the agenda view looks like
This should work out of the box and usually does.
What exactly does your entry look like?
- Carsten
On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:52, Michael wrote:
Right now the agenda view looks like:
Wednesday 13 June 2007
Work:15:30-17:00 Meeting <2007-06-13 Wed >
I would think the time stamp between <>
Right now the agenda view looks like:
Wednesday 13 June 2007
Work:15:30-17:00 Meeting <2007-06-13 Wed >
I would think the time stamp between <> is redundant. Can we remove it from
display in the agenda buffer? It makes long text entry look nicer.
Michael
__
