Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I quite like the idea of grouping the sequences within braces. However,
> I think we might be describing (slightly) different things. To clarify
> what I'd REALLY like to be able to do is to define different sequences,
> for use within a single file, r
Bastien wrote:
Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I can see that my suggestion would add complexity in both code and org
files. Supporting multiple DONE states would be a nice, especially if
they integrate properly with the agenda.
Maybe we could use the same grouping conventions than
Rick Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can see that my suggestion would add complexity in both code and org
> files. Supporting multiple DONE states would be a nice, especially if
> they integrate properly with the agenda.
Maybe we could use the same grouping conventions than for tags :
Carsten Dominik wrote:
No, this does not work. Could be done, of course, but adds complexity,
and I am sure once it is there, people will want to switch
TODO keywords constantly, filling the entire file with new #+TODO
statements. Does not feel right.
How about the following alternative:
J
Hi Rick,
On Mar 15, 2007, at 17:45, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Hi,
I've been using org-mode happily for nearly 6 months and think it's a
fantastic tool!! I've always quite liked Emacs, but org-mode has led
to me really seeing Emacs's potential.
I was however wondering if there was anyway for or
Hi,
I've been using org-mode happily for nearly 6 months and think it's a
fantastic tool!! I've always quite liked Emacs, but org-mode has led to
me really seeing Emacs's potential.
I was however wondering if there was anyway for org-mode to support
multiple TODO sequences within a single f
